Will Ben Affleck "wear his cockiness like an ironic T-shirt" in screen adaptation of Gone Girl?

Word is that David Fincher wants Ben Affleck as Nick for the thriller, Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn. Flynn must be in agreement; she and Fincher are writing the adaptation together.  
According to Deadline, Affleck will delay directing the adaptation of Dennis Lehane's Live By Night for Warner Bros to take the role. Told you about that here.

So does Ben fit with your picture of the former writer who, along with his New York-loving wife moves back to Missouri? And then, you know, s@#t happens. All kinds of s@#t.




Remember how Amy describes Nick when she first meets him ?

"..., he wears his cockiness like an ironic T-shirt, but it fits him better. He is the kind of guy who carries himself like he gets laid a lot, a guy who likes women, a guy who would actually fuck me properly" Gone Girl, p.24

"Mainly, I will admit, I smile because he's gorgeous. Distractingly gorgeous, the kind of looks that make your eyes pinwheel, that make you want to just address the elephant - "You know you're gorgeous, right?" - and move on with the conversation. I bet dudes hate him: He looks like the rich-boy villain in an 80's teen movie - the one who  bullies the sensitive misfit, the one who will end up with a pie in the puss, the whipped cream wilting his upturned collar as everyone in the cafeteria cheers" Gone Girl, p. 25

But she also tells us that he's not that guy; he's a regular guy, he's funny and he's nice.  And he sounds sexy - my opinion.

"He talks to me in his river-wavy Missouri accent: he was born and raised outside Hannibal"   and    "he informs me that Missoura is a magical place, the most beautiful in the world, no state more glorious. His eyes are mischievous, his lashes are long. I can see what he looked like as a boy."

The river-wavy accent is a little scary - it is just far too easy for actors to overdo the drawl and twang of southern accents - and Affleck - who I respect and adore - strikes me as being a tad too old -he's forty one and Nick is only 34! According to the L.A. Times I'm not alone with preferring a younger Nick; they say the results of an informal poll show readers prefer Ryan Gosling (YES!) with Jake Gyllenhaal a close second; both are 32. Ah well, there's still a chance Affleck will turn it down BUT no way Gyllenhaal would ever be cast; Fincher and Gyllenhaal did NOT get along on Zodiac. In fact, their discord has been written up in many a movie site; this piece in GAWKER kind of sums it up.

And what about Amy, that wonderful wife? There's no new news but I shared back in March that Reese Witherspoon, originally on-board to star via her own production company, Pacific Standard, had decided not to take on the role of Nick's wife, Amy Dunne. I wonder if Ben's casting will have an impact on Reese's decision? Here are the current front-runners for the job, although the Times says Portman is no longer on the short list. And no Jessica Chastain at all. Maybe not quite 'pretty' enough if you consider these classic beauties that Fincher is or was looking at.

Emily Mortimer

Charlize Theron

Natalie Portman

Read More

First Trailer for 12 Years A Slave starring Chiwetel Ejiofor and Michael Fassbender

The first trailer for 12 Years a Slave was just released; the movie stars Chiwetel Ejiofor as Solomon Northrupp, a free black man trapped into slavery. Michael Fassbender is the vicious slave-owner. Benedict Cumberbatch also plays a slave owner and Brad Pitt who produces, has a role as well. Steve McQueen, the risk-taking director behind the Fassbender starrer, Shame, as well as Hunger helmed the film, said to be a much darker take on the horrors of our history than Django Unchained.

Chiwetel Ejiofor and Michael Fassbender in 12 Years a Slave

<

Read More

Will Traynor: Dreaming of France in Me Before You

"Where would you go, if you could go anywhere?" Le Marais, Paris

My weekend reading, the devastating Me Before You, had me shedding tears aplenty but there was also plenty to smile at in this powerful, enlightening and utterly surprising novel.  
Louisa, has been hired on to be a caretaker/companion to Will Traynor, the handsome but bitter quadriplegic who has decided to end his life. Yes, it's that blunt and emotionally loaded. Louisa's goal is to make Will's life so full of adventure and surprise that he changes his mind. Will, on the other hand, is intent on making small-town girl Louisa live a larger life than the one afforded by her place of birth and education. 

"Promise me you won't spend the rest of your life stuck around this bloody parody of a place mat." Will tells her, the fact that he's the one stuck in the wheelchair not lost on Lou or the reader.  "You only get one life." Will tells her. "It's actually your duty to live it as fully as possible."

When Louisa asks him where she should go, Will's first thought is Paris. Ah, Paris. If only a cafe au lait and a croissant was the answer to everything.

A smile settled across his face now, his eyes creasing with pleasure.
"Paris. I would sit outside a cafe in Le Marais and drink coffee and eat a plate of warm croissants with unsalted butter and strawberry jam.""Le Marais?" "It's a little district in the center of Paris. It is full of cobbled streets and teetering apartment blocks and gay men and orthodox Jews and women of a certain age who once looked like Brigitte Bardot. It's the only place to stay." 

Me Before You, Jojo Moyes

The screen rights to Me Before You have been optioned by MGM.
Connect to the Dreaming of France meme hosted by Paulita at An Accidental Blog.

Read More

Weekend Reading

Weekend Reading

Read More

Saving Mr. Banks: The First Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Trailer

Tom Hanks as Disney, Emma Thompson as PL Travers
in Saving Mr. Banks

Just watched the trailer (scroll below to view) and am now officially looking forward to Saving Mr. Banks. The Disney movie starring Hanks as Walt himself reveals how Disney convinced a very reluctant P.L. (Pamela) Travers to sell the screen rights to the first of her series of childrens' books about Mary Poppins. Emma Thompson is the writer terrified the movie mogul would turn her heroine into a sugar-coated Disney cartoon character. Travers' Mary Poppins character was a darker sort than the beloved version Disney and Julie Andrews gave us; she wasn't crazy about all the song and dance either. I confess to loving that colorful 1964 rendition with all my heart; so much so that I coveted and received a Mary Poppins doll of my own.

The HAPPIEST place on earth

Just watching the trailer brings back memories, not just of Mary Poppins, but of those glorious early Disney days. MLH and I both remember being enthralled as Walt introduced each episode of his television show, especially when he shared 'an exciting new upcoming attraction'at Disneyland. 

Take a look at the trailer and see what you think. Does it bring back memories to any fellow boomers out there? While I remember Walt's voice having more in common with the warmer, deeper tones of another Walt (Walter Cronkite); I think Hanks captures that old Disney magic twinkle I remember from my Sunday night perch on the carpet beautifully. Of course, I was a child and completely bought into his polished folksiness. I'm

eager to see how he used his 'magic' to seduce Ms. Travers into giving in!  

Ms. Thompson, pulling her lower lip in persnickitty displeasure, looks perfectly cast as the writer rightly worried about how Walt might treat her creation.  I'm really excited about the film exploring that dynamic, as well as more about Travers' background. Especially the bit about Mr. Banks being Travers' father, and Mary Poppins being a real nanny. We get a glimpse of the films' cast - Colin Farrel and Ruth Wilson as Travers' parents; BJ Novak and Jason Schwartzman as Robert and Richard Sherman, the songwriters Disney relied on for many of his musicals including Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Jungle Book and The Aristrocrats.  Wow! The music of our young lives! Bradley Whitford is Don DaGradi, a staff writer and Disney animator who co-wrote Mary Poppins with Bill Walsh - can't find Walsh in the Saving Mr. Banks imdb listing:(  Hate it when they leave real people out for the sake of drama. Anyway, the movie features a huge cast and what looks to be a Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious behind the scenes look at the journey from page to screen.

                 

SAVING MR. BANKS COME OUT CHRISTMAS 2013 .... SAVE ME A SEAT!

Saving Mr. Banks - Trailer No. 1

Read More

Broken by Daniel Clay : My Q&A with the author of the book behind the movie

Yesterday I posted my thoughts on Daniel Clay's best-selling novel, Broken, which you can read here if you like.  Published in 2008, the gripping story has been made into a film which opens July 18th here in the states. I intended to write that if the film is half as good as the book, the filmmakers could have a huge hit on their hands but the film has won the award for the Best Independent British Film from BIFA so mission accomplished! Tim Roth, Cillian Murphy and Eloise Laurence star along with Rory Kinnear who took home a BIFA Best Supporting Actor for playing the brutish Bob Oswald.

To mark the movie's debut Daniel is allowing me to offer you a chance to win a signed copy of his book. You can enter the contest by clicking here.  ! The contest is closed. He was also gracious enough to do this lovely long interview with me:

I'm pleased to welcome Daniel Clay, the author of the best-selling book, Broken! 

First of all, Congrats! I see the movie based on your book has won the Best British Independent Film award from the British Independent Film Association! What a fantastic outcome for your debut novel.

Thank you! Yes, it was great. I wasn’t lucky enough to be there on the night and the BIFA awards aren’t televised, so I sort of ‘watched’ it unfold on Twitter. The fantastic Rory Kinnear won Best Supporting Actor for his portrayal of Bob Oswald and then it won the big one. I’ve got such huge respect for everyone involved in the film and was just delighted for them that it won.

I’ve read that Broken was optioned for the screen before it was even published; I can only imagine how that must have felt! Can you share how that came about and your reactions to the news? 

It was all out of the blue and sort of crept up on me. Quite often, after a publishing deal gets agreed, there’s a lag of about ten months or so before publication to allow for edits, proofing, etc. So a few months after Broken had sold in the UK, US and Canada, I went up to London to see my agent and ended up sitting in an office just down the corridor from him with a producer from Curtis Brown’s Film & Television department saying they had a screenwriter looking at it and were already talking to BBC Films about funding... it was all done very soberly though as the film world is very uncertain so it wasn’t as if there were champagne corks being popped and any back-slapping going on – just them saying be aware we’re really interested and excited about this and we hope to be in touch. That was probably October or November of 2007. I think it was February 2008 before I heard anything else and late 2011 before filming finally began!

Did the screenwriter make many changes to the story? Was it difficult to see how they fiddled with your work? 

The screenwriter (Mark O’Rowe, who adapted the fantastic Boy A from Jonathan Trigell’s great novel of the same name – a must see and must read, if you’ve not already, I think) and the director (Rufus Norris, an award winning theatre director who’s very well known in the UK) made huge changes, but I always thought they would have to in order to make the book work as a film. When I had the meeting I referred to above I sat there thinking about some of the scenes in the novel and just couldn’t see how they would work for an audience visually on screen – though I believe they make for extremely powerful and gripping reading in the book. So I sort of expected the film to be different and was more relieved than upset when I saw the film for the first time. I’m overjoyed with what they’ve done.

Eloise Laurence (Skunk) and Tim Roth (her dad, Archie)

The book is a mix of dark humor, suspense, and family drama; was it difficult to find the right tone? 

Not really, in terms of tone, because the first draft of the novel was all written in first-person from Skunk’s viewpoint, and her voice and the way she saw the world just sort of arrived in my head: Where she was telling the story from a coma, it felt as if she was doing the voice-over in a Desperate Housewives/American Beauty style (where you feel there’s a presence floating over a set of houses), and she was just free to comment on things in a way you can’t really in third person fiction, which is the style I usually write in: Even before I really knew what the story was going to be about, I just wrote and wrote all sorts of things from her point of view because I loved writing from her perspective and thinking about the way she viewed the world around her. I think her tone and her take on the world countered the darkness of the plot, and the fact she could just flit from one family situation to another gave the narration a real sense of speed. Something wasn’t right with the whole novel being in her first person voice, though, and my agent suggested having some parts in third person and the rest remaining in first person, which I did try, but it felt too uneven. In the end I switched it to be virtually all third person with snippets of the original first person remaining and felt straight away that the manuscript was suddenly there.

What led you to write this particular story? 

I was in the doldrums as a writer before I wrote it – other than a couple of short stories and poems I was unpublished but I’d had quite a high profile agent who’d seen a manuscript of mine, loved my writing but not that novel, and had asked me to try writing a psychological thriller. At first it went really well and when he saw the first fifty pages he raved about it and said he’d told all sorts of publishers and they were all desperate to see the finished version. And, for some reason, the novel just started to go wrong from that point on. He didn’t like the finished version and suggested a re-write. I did a re-write. He didn’t like that. And so, after almost four years, we just sort of went our separate ways. I then had another go at that novel, spent a further year on it (around doing my day-job as well; other than a spell around the time Broken was published, I’ve always worked to finance my writing), and still no-one was interested. I then tried to write another psychological thriller which didn’t get going, then a crime novel that didn’t get going, and was on a bit of a downer with the publishing industry and myself in general when I picked up a copy of To Kill A Mockingbird that had been lying around the house for years. I’d never read it before and knew nothing about Harper Lee, so had no idea it was a debut novel written by a woman who’d been earning a living as a clerk for an airline company at the time she’d written it; I didn’t actually find that out until I stumbled upon a newspaper article about her the following year, and I just started to think – well, if a literary nobody (which she pretty much was at the time she started writing that novel) like Harper Lee could dare to write To Kill A Mockingbird, why am I messing around trying to write psychological thrillers and crime novels when I don’t really like reading psychological thrillers and crime novels, and don’t seem very good at writing them either? Why can’t I at least challenge myself to write something I believe in and care about rather than something I think might get published. I also started to wonder what a great writer like Harper Lee would choose to write about if she was living my life, in the street where I was living. And, finally, I started to wonder how the main family structures in To Kill A Mockingbird might interact with each other and the world around them if they were living in a modern day English suburb: In short, Broken isn’t a re-telling of To Kill A Mockingbird or an attempt to write in the same style, but the background of how that novel came to be written and the differences between that novel’s depression-era society and our own society were the things that inspired me to write it.

You’ve spoken about the characters from To Kill a Mockingbird as being your initial, I think I would say, "muse", for the book. Can you talk about some of the correlations especially between Skunk and Scout and Boo Radley and Broken Buckley? 

Definitely: When I read To Kill a Mockingbird, it made me think of my own childhood – especially in terms of unsupervised time – because my mother had died when I was young which meant there were a couple of school holidays where I pretty much had the house to myself every day because the rest of the family were at work: I could literally get up to whatever I wanted, something my friends couldn’t because they had a mother at home to keep them in line. These days, with working mothers becoming the norm more and more, I started to think how much freedom nearly all children must have compared to my own childhood even though I’d had more freedom than a child such as Scout in To Kill a Mockingbird, which got me thinking about the opportunities – and dangers – this must lead to, which is where a lot of the plotting in Broken comes from – the fact caring for children should be the most important thing to a parent, but, often, providing for them has to come first.
With Boo and Broken, I decided to take Scout’s narration (mostly based on imagination and hearsay) as fact – that Boo was someone who’d suffered a nervous breakdown and was now pretty much kept hidden from the world by his family. I’d had a situation in my own life where someone close to me had been sectioned, stabilized with medication, returned home, stopped taking the medication, become even worse than before, and then needed sectioning again. When I read Mockingbird I just kept thinking, well, here’s this society all these years ago struggling with a problem, and here we are, all these years later, still struggling with the same problem, and although the treatments and methods are different, neither society seems to have got it right. It was a thought that kept nagging at me, so one I wanted to explore.
A few people have complained to me that Broken is an unfair representation of how our social services system really is over here, but what happens in the novel isn’t meant to be a reflection of the care available, just an exploration of what can happen when vulnerable people fall through the cracks of that system. And, I’m very sorry to say, sometimes they do.

The young actress, who plays Skunk, Eloise Laurence was nominated for a BIFA for best newcomer. How did you feel about such a young person, in fact all the young actors, working with such disturbing material? 

If they’d gone with the full plot of the novel, I think I’d have felt very uncomfortable, but I always doubted they would be true to certain sections of the novel (I think the way they’ve maneuvered the story around those parts is brilliant). Also, I trusted the experience of the people involved with the production to take care of the youngsters who’d been cast – quite a few have talked openly about the fact they’re parents themselves, and it’s the different aspects of parenthood displayed in the novel that first attracted them to the project: As it turned out, Eloise’s mother, Clare Burt, plays Mrs. Buckley, so was actually in all of the scenes I’d have thought would have been hardest for Eloise to get through – or, at the very least, on the set – which, hopefully, would have helped.

One of the things I enjoy is hearing who authors would like to see in the lead roles if their books were turned into films. Did you have any ideas about who should play Archie and who should play Mike beforehand? What do you think of the casting of Tim Roth and Cillian Murphy. 

I genuinely had no thoughts on who I’d like to be cast. As far as I can remember, there are very few physical descriptions of the characters in the novel because I’m not a writer who likes to introduce a character by stopping the forward momentum to describe what they look like, and I then don’t like to take the risk of adding a physical description to a character a reader has (hopefully) already formed a picture of. I think Bob Oswald is the only one who’s given a firm description early on in the novel, and I can’t really think of any actors who look like that description of Bob!
My jaw did drop, though, when I saw stars such as Cillian Murphy putting their names to the script...

Watch the trailer!

The film’s director, Rufus Norris, was also a nominee. Clearly the film is a critical success over there. Were you at all concerned about a first time film director turning your book into his cinematic vision? 

No, not at all. I mean, he’s regarded as a huge success over here already because of his work as a director of great theatre, so it wasn’t really as if he was a bona-fide first time director, just someone with a wonderful track-record attacking a different medium. On top of that, possibly my favourite film ever, American Beauty, was Sam Mendes’s first movie after proving himself in theatre, so I was always excited rather than nervous to see how Rufus would do.

That's Cillian Murphy under those bandages

Did you visit the set? Can you talk about what they filmed that day? Was it a scene from the book? How did it compare? 

My wife and I had one day on the set, and it was such a brilliant experience: We were lucky enough to meet Denis Lawson (who plays Mr. Buckley), Clare Burt (Mrs. Buckley), Robert Emms (Broken), and Eloise in the morning where they shot some scenes in the hospital Broken spends some time in after he’s sectioned: Although Broken does spend time in this hospital in the book, my vision of it was very different and the actual scenes they were shooting aren’t in the book.
The place they were shooting was a disused office complex in north London and it was our first ever time on a film-set. My initial impression was how many people there were and the size of the building they’d taken over – I hope I’m not an egotistical person, but it was very strange to look around at the amount of people there and think it really had all started with me, and I’ve had a similar feeling the two times I’ve seen the credits roll at the end of the film – so many actors and producers and musicians and investors and systems involved to bring something like that the big screen, and all of it started with me on my own in my lunch-hour at work. It’s a very bizarre thing to think.
But that was nothing compared to the afternoon, when we went to the cul-de-sac where most of the action in the film (and the book) takes place. They’d rented out two houses and had permission to shoot outside a third one, but when I say rented out, I really mean completely taken over – redecorated, put up pictures of the cast in family poses, I mean, just made these characters’ worlds real: Rufus took us on a tour of both houses and it was like stepping into another world. But it was funny as well because he kept saying things like, yes, we’ve got this here because Skunk’s diabetic... er, is she in the book? And I’d go, no, and we’d move on and he’d go, yes, and we’ve got this picture here of Bob and his three daughters... er, is that how many daughters he has in the book? And I’d go no, and we’d move on... Like I’ve said, I was expecting big changes – and they didn’t disappoint!

The scenes they shot that afternoon featured Cillian Murphy (Mike), Bill Milner (Jed), Zana Marjanovic (Kasia – who’s actually called Cerys in the novel), and Eloise again. Again, none of the scenes were scenes from the novel, exactly, but that cast of characters do spend a lot of time together in the novel. It was great meeting all the actors involved but obviously a bit special to meet Cillian Murphy. We spent about ten minutes chatting to him and he just seems like a really nice down to earth person – very easy to talk to, very approachable – but he definitely has something about him that makes him stand out; not just his looks, but his voice as well, and possibly the knowledge that this person has seen things/done things/met people you’re probably never going to yourself.

For the record, Broken was an incredibly gripping, disturbing, funny and moving book. It hits a couple of terrible touchstones we are dealing with here in the states; Mental health and violence. While not gun violence, the violence that does occur in Broken is awful enough. Our system here in the states is as BROKEN as it appears to be there. Can you talk about the role of violence in art, at least so far as your book is concerned?

I always find this difficult to talk about, because what happens in Broken wasn’t really a conscious decision on my part; I was led there by the characters – I mean, to try and explain without spoiling the plot for anyone, I never sat down and thought, character X is going to do something to character Y and this in turn will lead to all sorts of trouble for several other major characters. I was led there by a scene in To Kill A Mockingbird where the children dare each other to run up and touch the side of the Radley house and the fact I felt very strongly that children nowadays wouldn’t challenge each other to run up and touch the side of a house, they’d challenge each other to go much, much further than that. And I know that sounds a terrible stain on kids of today, but I based that assumption on the fact that, when I’d been about nine, a friend’s family had gone on holiday and I and another friend had dared each other to break into the empty house and steal a toy car we both coveted. Our attempts to do this were pathetic – we stood in the road throwing small stones at the front-room window until an adult came out of another house and chased us away! – but the thought process and intentions had been there. So this led me to have Dillon, who’s already displayed a disregard for the law and other people’s property, take the opportunity to get into the Buckley house and steal their DVD player, which in turn led the novel to take the dark turn that then leads to so much more darkness and pain: So, really, much more than consciously trying to explore violence and darkness in society, I was trying to explore the differences between my childhood, the childhood depicted in To Kill a Mockingbird, and some children’s childhoods today.
In terms of art in general, though – or, rather, writing in general – I think it’s important that both new and established writers continue to provoke with honest and thoughtful explorations of how our society can go wrong. For me, I’m going to continue writing about the things that I see around me that then nag away in the back of my mind. So I am kind of hoping my plots brighten up!

Thank you Daniel! As I've said, I highly recommend the book and can't wait for the film to make it to the US!
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED 3/5/2013 Updated 7/9/13

Read More

Broken by Daniel Clay: My take on the book behind the movie

The film based on the book hits the states July 18th so I'm reposting my take on the novel by Daniel Clay in case you want to give it a read before the movie comes out.
 "'Skunk, Skunk. Wake up, beautiful darling.'

   Archie, my father, holds both my hands as he says this. I sense his words rather than hear them:'Skunk, Skunk. Wake up, beautiful darling.'   I also sense his life now.
   It seeps through his palms into my palms. It deadens the blood in my veins. My heartbeat slows. I shudder. Poor old Archie. This is the way that his life is. I see it. I feel it. I know it. Tonight from midnight through to two in the morning, he will sit all alone in the front room and watch a video of the day I was born. Almost twelve years ago now. There I am. You can see me. A wrinkled pink sack of flesh that does little but lie on its back with tubes feeding into its nostrils. Not a lot different to now then.                     "             

These are the opening lines of Daniel Clay's Broken. The pace grabbed me from the instant I started reading and didn't let up until I'd finished the book, spent with emotion from the unrelenting force of Clay's narrative.  This is what I posted quickly to GoodReads in lieu of a review:

An utter page turner that punched me in the guts. I found it both incredibly moving and disturbing.

I haven't changed my mind about that one bit!

Here's the overview of Broken from Barnes and Noble:

Until that fateful afternoon, Skunk Cunningham had been a normal little girl, playing on the curb in front of her house. Rick Buck­ley had been a normal geeky teen­ager, hosing off his brand-new car. Bob Oswald had been a normal sociopathic single father of five slutty daughters, charging furiously down the side­walk. Then Bob was beating Rick to a bloody pulp, right there in the Buckleys' driveway, and life on Drummond Square was never the same again.

Inspired by Harper Lee's classic To Kill a Mockingbird, Clay's brilliantly observed and darkly funny novel follows the sudden unraveling of a sub­urban community after a single act of thoughtless cruelty.

Clay takes us from those opening lines - from Skunk lying motionless in a hospital room, back in time to see what she saw, to witness with her the inciting incident and the series of events that follow.  It all begins when she sees her neighbor, Bob Oswald, beat Rick Buckley to a pulp in his driveway. Buckley is a gawky, brooding nineteen year old whom Oswald's five daughters love to pick on but, it's the 13 year old, Susan, who accuses Buckley of having sex with her. We quickly learn  that Susan is actually a virgin; she invents the lie about having sex with Buckley - which her dad immediately sees as rape - in order to prevent getting a beating herself. While Susan and her sisters are, hmmm what to call them - sparing you the epithets I'll just say not very bright and not very nice - they are sharp enough to know which side their bread is buttered on and how to play their dad for all he's worth.

Because Bob Oswald is two things if nothing else; a blindly devoted father quite playable by his daughters and a raging maniac when he's angry. Anyone saying anything, anytime about his daughters can make him angry. A single dad with a chip on his shoulder, alchohol at the ready, he's all too happy to believe his daughter has been raped and wail into the guy everyone calls a wierdo.

That's what starts it all. That beating sets the wheels in motion, the ripples are endless, affecting almost everyone in the community. And while Buckley responds by retreating more and more into himself, and his home, Skunk becomes more morbidly curious. For awhile it's like a wound she can't help touching. Only when Buckley is taken by Social Services to a secure mental health facility for awhile does Skunk forget.

Story-wise, I'll leave you at the start because I don't want to spoil one moment of this intensely gripping page turner.  Along the way, I found myself laughing in surprise and recognition - Clay has an uncanny way of tapping into the humor of everyday life; there is humor even in the deep disappointments and dark places. And tears. Plenty of tears which is understandable when you think of Skunk's age. Despite the cover; this is no kid's book.

Over the course of the novel,  Skunk grows into an average 12 year old girl entering 'secondary school' (middle school to most Americans) and encounters a rush of feelings; her fascination with Buckley, her crush on her teacher, her fluttering feelings for the new boy in town, her hopes for her father's happiness (her mother walked out on her father, Skunk and her brother Jed), her need for her father's love. Average but so loveable and good-hearted which just makes the story stab a little deeper.

I particularly appreciated how Clay's style, with its staccato sentences, pushes the story along. He has a way with dialogue, using clipped sentences and simple language, that sounds completely natural. Whether it's the family bickering and quiet conversations, the street language, the blunt and foul words in the mouths of babes, it all flows with authenticity which is often both alarming and funny.

Clay also uses repetition to great effect throughout vis a vis this example when Skunk's father, Archie, goes to visit Rick's dad to see how things are. Rick has just come home from a mental ward.

"        'You OK, Dave?'
         Mr. Buckley felt his cheeks redden.'Oh yes, fine, fine.'
        
         'You sure?' 

Mr. Buckley looked at Archie Cunningham. He thought, Archie, I know you mean well, but there's nothing you can do , so why don't you leave me alone?                                                                                                             

'Yes,' he said. 'Everything's fine.'

          Archie Cunningham looked at Mr. Buckley. He thought, Jesus, I know I mean well, but there's                 nothing I can do' I wish I'd left this alone.
         
          He said, 'Well, OK. But if there's anything I can do, we're only across the square.'

          'Thanks, Archie. You're a pal.
 "    

But things are not fine in Mr. Buckley's world, not at all; Clay seems to be saying how sad and insular we humans are at our core, desperate to keep our inner pain and disappointments on the down-low, unwilling to let others in, let them truly see us; how in that process when we disconnect from each other and the world around us, we set a dangerous precedent in motion where anything can happen.

Another driving force in the novel is the actual physical makeup of the book. It's chapter-less! I don't know that I've seen that before. In any case, since the publisher didn't tell me when to stop I tended to read and read, stopping only when I had to, either because I had something else to do or because I couldn't read through my tears anymore.

I asked Daniel about that in our Q&A.  I'll post the entire interview tomorrow, including his explanation of the To Kill a Mockingbird connection; I hope you'll come back and read it.


Broken is definitely a page turner.  It's unusual in that it has no chapter breaks, no rest stops. Is there a connection?
Yes, I think there's a connection; the lack of natural stopping points gives the novel a sense of pace I don't think it might have otherwise. I did it for three reasons - with the novel I'd written before (which was never published), I'd given it to a couple of friends to read and they'd each read to the end of chapter 1, raved about it, then never read on: I remembered that when I sat down to write Broken and just decided no-one was going to have the chance to do that to my writing this time around. Secondly, I just really felt I struggled to write those killer lines that wrap up one chapter and make the reader want to turn the page to the next one - however, really, that must be in my head because each double-return in Broken is really the end of a chapter, to my mind, so I think I was just trying to take the pressure off myself a little simply by doing away with chapter numbers in-between. And thirdly, I love concept albums where there's never a break in the music - especially when they end with the opening bars of the first song and make you want to listen all over again - and I wanted that sort of feel to the book, that it was a circle, starting with Skunk in the same scene as the one that closes the novel without any natural pause in-between. 

My take? This was a tough book to read; and yet I couldn't put it down. The awfulness of the awful series of events packs an awfully big punch but so too did the characters' lives, with all their foibles and flaws, their push and pull, their failed efforts to help themselves and each other. If Rick Buckley is 'broken', so too is Bob Oswald, so too is Skunk's dad Archie, so too is the mental health system and society at large.

Broken, the film based on
Daniel Clay's book
won the award for Best
Indepent British film!

Will this book make a good movie? Yes and it has been! The award winning film comes out Friday, March 8 in the U.K. where it was nominated in several categories for a BIFA - the British Independent Film Awards.  Adapted for film by Irish writer, Mark O'Rowe and  directed by British stage director Rufus Norris, Broken won the BIFA for BEST BRITISH INDEPENDENT FILM with Rory Kinnear winning Best Supporting Actor for playing Bob Oswald. The movie stars Tim Roth as Archie, Cillian Murphy as Skunk's teacher, and Eloise Laurence as Skunk. If and when the film comes to the US, I'll be there watching. I'm keeping my finger's crossed that someone like Harvey Weinstein has it on his radar and picks it up for US distribution. And I hope it plays well over there so we get a chance to see it over here!
UPDATE: The film IS coming to the states ... watch for it July 18th.
Tomorrow I'll post the Q&A I did with the very generous Daniel Clay; I think you'll find his responses as fascinating as I did.
                                                                                                 

Read More